Editorial Team
COUNSELLERS
- PhD. José Valentim dos Santos Filho
- PhD. Renê Medeiros de Souza
- PhD. Tassio Ferreira Vale
- MSc. Paulo Henrique Ribeiro do Nascimento
- MSc. João Carlos Nunes Bittencourt
MANAGER EDITOR
- MSc. Paulo Henrique Ribeiro do Nascimento
SCIENTIFIC EDITORS
- Physics Section
- Math Section:
- Statistic Section
- Chemical and Biochemistry Section:
- Civil Engineering Section
- PhD. Fernanda Nepomuceno Costa (UFRB / Google Acadêmico / Lattes) / Orcid)
- Computer Engineering Section
- Electrical Engineering Section:
- Mechanical Engineering Section:
- Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Section
- Engineering Teaching Section
- Teaching of Exact Sciences Section:
- Teaching of Mathematics
- PhD. Rogelma Maria da Silva Ferreira (UFRB / Google Acadêmico / Lattes / Orcid)
- PhD. Anderson Reis da Cruz (UFRB / Google Acadêmico/ Lattes / Orcid)
- Clean Technologies Section
LAYOUT EDITORS
- Jean Monteiro dos Santos
- Marcus Vinícius Fraga Lobo Filho
- Rafael Martins dos Santos Peixoto
- Aldair Sousa dos Santos
- Luis Fernando Duarte Santana
TEAM ASSIGNMENTS
- The Managing Editor's duties are:
- Coordinate the entire Editorial Team;
- Manage the publishing system:
- Configuring the content of the web page, organizing the layout of articles;
- Registering other editors (Scientific Editors, Text Editors and Layout Editors), Authors and Reviewers.
- Provide statistical data on access to the Magazine that the system can generate.
- Analyze and direct submissions from authors of submitted articles;
- Maintain the periodicity of the magazine.
Approve the final version of each edition;
Coordinate the flow of the magazine's editing, production and dissemination work; - Provide electronic ISSN code;
- Provide Digital Object Identifier - DOI for articles.
- Be responsible for the Qualis/Capes elevation processes and qualitative and quantitative development of the journal; and
- Search indexers for the journal.
- The Scientific Editors are responsible for:
- Capture articles and publicize the magazine;
- Issue an opinion on the publication of an article submitted to the journal;
- Monitor the magazine's editing processes and the status of the submitted articles, aiming for speedy publication;
- Assign two ad hoc evaluators to evaluate the articles;
- Review, when necessary, publication standards.
- The Evaluator is a researcher in a specific area of knowledge, registered in the journal's system, who is selected by a Scientific Editor to evaluate a submission.
- Reviewers can be evaluated by Scientific Editors.
- Reviews must be conducted objectively. The author's personal criticism is inappropriate.
- Evaluators must clearly and objectively express their opinions with supporting arguments.
- Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in an article, or knows that rapid review will be impossible, must notify the Scientific Editor of their decline.
- Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
The Assessors’ duties are:
-
- identify whether the works cited are mentioned in the references section.
- check whether observations or arguments derived from other publications are accompanied by the respective source;
- notify any substantial similarity or overlap between the article in question and any other published articles of which they are aware;
- refuse to review articles in which they have conflicts of interest.
