Ethnocentrism and liberalism in Rorty´s neopragmatism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v19i3.1211

Keywords:

Philosophy; Ethnocentrism; Liberalism; Neopragmatism.

Abstract

ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this article is to investigate the relationship between the notions of ethnocentrism and liberalism from the perspective of the neopragmatist philosopher Richard Rorty. In this sense, we show that this tenuous political philosophy, centered on these notions, emphasizes the connectivity between conversational practices and the moral, political and social issues shared by different cultures. In Rorty's philosophy, his thin notion of ethnocentrism acts as an articulating element between his anti-representationalist perspective of knowledge and his version of political liberalism. From the naturalist criticism that makes transcendental explanations of reality unfeasible Rorty draws the historicist consequences necessary for his proposition that there are no limits, except those of conversational character, for the apprehension and description of knowledge. In this ethnocentric proposal in which there is nothing transcendent in relation to cultural, contingent and historical practices, everything is considered to be dependent on the provisional intersubjective consensus, in terms of the vocabulary and politics of a given community and time.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Heraldo Aparecido Silva, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos – SP, Brasil. Professor da Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Teresina – PI, Brasil.

References

CONANT, James. Freedom, Cruelty, and Truth: Rorty versus Orwell. In: BRANDOM, Robert. B. (ed.). Rorty and his critics. Oxford/New York: Blackwell, 2000. p. 268-342.

DEWEY, John. Reconstrução em filosofia. 2. ed. Trad. António Pinto de Carvalho. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1959.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.

HUXLEY, Aldous. Admirável Mundo Novo. Trad. Vidal de Oliveira e Lino Vallandro. 18 ed. São Paulo: Globo, 1993.

KUNDERA, M. A arte do romance (ensaio). Trad. Teresa B. C. da Fonseca e Vera Mourão. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1988.

KUNDERA, M. Os testamentos traídos (ensaios). Trad. Teresa B. C. da Fonseca e Maria L. N. Silveira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1994.

LYOTARD, Jean-François. A condição pós-moderna. 7. ed. Trad. R. C. Barbosa. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 2002.

ORWELL, George. 1984. 23ª. ed. Trad. Wilson Velloso. São Paulo: Editora Nacional, 1996.

RACHELS, James. The elements of Moral Philosophy. 4ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

RAMBERG, Bjorn. Richard Rorty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2001. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/info.html#c>. Acesso em: mar. 2019.

RORTY, Richard. Introduction: Metaphilosophical difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy. In: RORTY, Richard (org.). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays on Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. p. 1-39.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.

RORTY, Richard. The contingency of language. In: Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989a. p. 3-22.

RORTY, Richard. The last intellectual in Europe: Orwell on cruelty contingency of language. In: RORTY, Richard. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989a. p. 169-188.

RORTY, Richard. Truth and Freedom: a Reply to Thomas McCarthy. Critical Inquiry (16): 633-643, 1990.

RORTY, Richard. Introduction. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991a. p. 1-17.

RORTY, Richard. Solidarity or objectivity?. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991b. p. 21-34.

RORTY, Richard. The priority of democracy to philosophy. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991c. p. 175-196.

RORTY, Richard. Postmodernist bourgeois liberalism. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991d. p. 197-202.

RORTY, Richard. On ethnocentrism: A reply to Clifford Geertz. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991e. p. 203-210.

RORTY, Richard. Cosmopolitanism without emancipation: A response to Jean-François Lyotard. In: RORTY, Richard. Objectivity, relativism, and truth – philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991f. p. 175-196.

RORTY, Richard. Pragmatismo. In: CARRILHO, Manuel Maria (org.). Dicionário do Pensamento Contemporâneo. Lisboa: Dom Quixote, 1991g. p. 265-277.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy as science, as metaphor, and as politics. In: RORTY, Richard. Essays on Heidegger and others – philosophical papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995a. p. 9-26.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy and the future. In: SAATKAMP Jr., Hermann J. (ed.). Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to his Critics. Nashville/London: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995b. p. 197-205.

RORTY, Richard. Truth and Progress – philosophical papers 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

RORTY, Richard. American National Pride: Whitman and Dewey. In: RORTY, Richard. Achieving our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. p. 3-38.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin, 2000.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy as Cultural Politics – philosophical papers 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

SCHULENBERG, Ulf. Romanticism and Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and the idea of a poetized culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Published

2019-10-15

How to Cite

SILVA, Heraldo Aparecido. Ethnocentrism and liberalism in Rorty´s neopragmatism. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 145–155, 2019. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v19i3.1211. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/1211. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles