VÊ SE ISSO SÃO HORAS:

ANALOGIZAÇÃO E O SURGIMENTO DE UMA NOVA CONSTRUÇÃO IDIOMÁTICA COM VÊ/VEJA SE S NO PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO

Authors

  • Dennis de Oliveira Alves UFRJ
  • Diogo Oliveira Ramires Pinheiro UFRJ

Keywords:

Idiomatic constructions, Analogization, Language change

Abstract

This article aims to investigate an idiomatic construction involving the sequence VÊ/VEJA SE S (as in “Vê se domingo é dia de trabalhar” and “Veja se isso é hora de acordar”) in Brazilian Portuguese. The study is grounded in the theoretical framework of Usage-Based Construction Grammar (UBCG) and adopts the constructionist model of language change proposed by Traugott and Trousdale (2013). Methodologically, the research relies on both quantitative and qualitative-interpretative analyses of data extracted from the Corpus do Português. The data show that the construction under investigation, here referred to as the Disagreement Construction, is specialized in expressing the speaker’s rejection or denial of a belief attributed to a Subject of Consciousness (SdC). This construction appears to have emerged in the 20th century through the cognitive process of analogization, modeled after a preexisting idiomatic construction— the Reproach Construction —, which conveys a negative evaluation of a potential behavior attributed to the interlocutor. Through this analysis, the article contributes to the understanding of idiomatic constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and to the theoretical development of the constructionist approach to language change. The findings suggest that analogization functions as a key mechanism in the creation of new form-meaning pairings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUTORES. “Vê se lê este artigo”: O surgimento de uma construção idiomática com VÊ/VEJA SE S no português brasileiro. In: PINTO, D. C. M.; MARENGO, S. D. (orgs.). Filologia e Linguística Histórica. Revista LinguíStica UFRJ, v. 19, n. 1, 2023.

BYBEE, J. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: United Kingdom University Press, 2010.

DIEWALD, G. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In: Constructions, Special Volume 1, 2006, p. 1-28.

FILLMORE, C. Syntatic Intrusions and The Notion of Grammatical Construction. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1985, p. 73-86.

FILLMORE, C.; KAY, P.; O’CONNOR, C. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language, n. 64, 1988, p. 501-538.

HIMMELMANN, N. P. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Oppositive or orthogonal? In: BISANG, W. et al. (orgs.). What makes grammaticalization? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004, p. 21-42.

LAKOFF, G. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about mind. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1987.

LANGACKER, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application, California: Stanford University Press, 1991.

TANTUCCI, V. From co-actionality to extended intersubjectivity: Drawing on language change and ontogenetic development. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), p. 185-214.

TANTUCCI, V. Language and social minds: The semantics and pragmatics of intersubjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

TRAUGOTT, E.; DASHER, R. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

TRAUGOTT, E.; TROUSDALE, G. Constructionalization and constructional changes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Published

2026-06-08