The cognitive subject in I. Kant’s philosophy: characteristics, limits, and legacy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v26i1.5802

Keywords:

Cognitive Subject; Kantian Philosophy; Rational Cognition; Phenomena and Noumena; A Priori and Empirical. .

Abstract

The cognitive subject in I. Kant's philosophy occupies a central position in the development of modern epistemology, marking a decisive shift from object-centered to subject-centered theories of knowledge. This article investigates the key characteristics of Kant’s cognitive subject through a critical analysis of his major works, particularly Critique of Pure Reason, and situates it within the broader context of Enlightenment thought. The study applies dialectical and historical materialist methodology to reveal six defining features: (1) the cognitive subject is formed through Kant’s critical method, emphasizing self-reflection and the limits of reason; (2) it is proactive, dynamic, and creative, not a passive recipient of external stimuli; (3) it raises foundational questions about dialectical logic and the conditions of knowledge; (4) it is speculative and ahistorical, reflecting Enlightenment individualism; (5) it is characterized by epistemological limits, as Kant asserts the unknowability of the “thing-in-itself”; and (6) it unifies the cognitive, moral, and aesthetic dimensions of the human subject. The article also critically examines the legacy of Kant’s conception, highlighting both its enduring influence on epistemology and its limitations, particularly the abstraction from social and historical context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nguyễn Vân Hạnh, Academy of Journalism and Communication (AJC)

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.). Academy of Journalism and Communication (AJC), Hanoi, Vietnam.

References

CAYGILL, Howard. A Kant Dictionary. Translated by Chau Van Ninh and associates. Hanoi: Knowledge Publishing House, 2013.

DO, Minh Hanh. The issue of subjectivity in modern Western philosophy. Philosophy Journal, no.1, pp.29–32, 1996.

HUU NGOC and associates. Essential Dictionary of Philosophy. Hanoi: University and Vocational Publishing House, 1987.

ILYENKOV, Evald V. Dialectical Logic. Translated by Nguyen Anh Tuan. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House, 2003.

KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Bui Van Nam Son. Hanoi: Literature Publishing House, 2004.

KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Bui Van Nam Son. Hanoi: Knowledge Publishing House, 2007a..

KANT, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Bui Van Nam Son. Hanoi: Knowledge Publishing House, 2007b.

LE, Cong Son. Man through the Philosopher’s Lens. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2012.

LE, Ton Nghiem. What is the Root of Thought? The Philosophical Path from Kant to Heidegger. Hanoi: Literature Publishing House, 2007.

LE, Tu Thanh. Four Giants of Modern Western Philosophy: Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Marx. Ho Chi Minh City: Youth Publishing House, 2014.

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES. Philosophy: Problems of Epistemology and Ethics. Proceedings of the International Conference, Hanoi, Dec 21–22, 2004. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2006.

SOVIET ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, Institute of Philosophy. History of Dialectics, vol. 3: Classical German Dialectics. Translated by Le Huu Tang and associates. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 1998.

TRAN, Thai Dinh. Kant’s Philosophy. Ho Chi Minh City: Age Publishing Company & Literature Publishing House, 2014.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

HẠNH, Nguyễn Vân. The cognitive subject in I. Kant’s philosophy: characteristics, limits, and legacy. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 84–100, 2026. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v26i1.5802. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/5802. Acesso em: 9 mar. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles