The division of fine arts: Kant and Hegel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.979Keywords:
Beautiful art; Genius; private Arts; Kant; Hegel.Abstract
This article discusses a philosophical perspective the relationship between fine arts Division proposed by Kant and Hegel. Aims to clarify the approaches and distances between the Division of fine arts presented by philosophers, pointing out their similarities and differences. Basing your analysis on The Critic of Judgement of 1790 and Aesthetics Courses (1820-21), respectively prepared by Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Hegel. Performs a comparative analysis between the Division of Kantian and Hegelian fine arts. Features initially the Division of fine arts on Kantian perspective, addressing the concept of beautiful art, your classification and your hierarchy, according to the philosopher of Königsberg. Then, the Division of the arts according to Hegel, introducing the concept of your beautiful, artistic forms of symbolic art, classical and romantic, exposing and analyzing also the private Arts according to the philosopher of Stuttgart. Concludes that, despite the differences between the two analyses on the Division of fine arts, such as the defense of Hegel in beautiful artistic relationship and of Kant to the beautiful natural, the Hegelian claim that there is a science of the beautiful while the Kantian conception is that there is no science of the be it, for example, featured philosophers agree, among other things, that poetry occupies the highest place in the hierarchy of the fine arts, being the more spiritual and free them.
Downloads
References
ALLISON, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: a Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judg-ment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. E-book.
CASSISER, E. (1997). Filosofia do Iluminismo. Trad. Álvaro Cabral 3. ed. Campinas, SP: Editora da UNICAMP.
GONÇALVES, M. (2004). A idéia da corporalidade na estética de Hegel. In: MORAES, A. O. Razão nos trópicos: festschrift em homenagem a Paulo Meneses no seu 80º aniversário. Recife: FASA.
GONÇALVES, M. (2004). A morte e a vida da arte. KRITERION, Belo Horizonte, n° 109, Jun/2004, p. 46-56.
GONÇALVES, M. (2005). Uma concepção dialética da arte a partir da gênese do conceito de trabalho na fenomenologia do espírito de Hegel. KRITERION, Belo Horizonte, nº 112, Dez/2005, p. 260-272.
HEGEL, G. W F. (2001). Cursos de estética. Vol. I. Tradução de Marco Aurélio Werle. São Paulo: EDUSP.
HEGEL, G. W F. (1995). Enciclopédia das ciências filosóficas em compêndio: 1830. Texto completo, com os adendos orais, traduzido por Paulo Meneses, com a colaboração de José Machado. São Paulo: Loyola.
HUGHES, F. (2014). “Um potencial político no juízo estético reflexionante: Kant, Han-nah Arendt e ‘Pequena esparta, de Ian Hamilton Finlay”. Tradução de Giorgia Cecchina-to. In: Gosto, interpretação e crítica, Vol.1, ed. por Verlaine Freitas, Rodrigo Duarte, Gior-gia Cecchinato, Cíntia Vieira da Silva, Belo Horizonte, Relicário.
KANT. I. (1957). Kritik der Urteilsckaft und naturphilosophische Schriften 2. In: KANT. Werke in Zwölf Bänden. Bänden X. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
KANT. I. (1995). Crítica da faculdade do juízo. 2. ed. Tradução de Valério Rohden e Antó-nio Marques. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.
KANT. I. (2017). Crítica da Faculdade de Julgar. Tradução de Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes; Bragança Paulista, SP: Editora Universitária São Francisco. E-book Kindle.
WOOD, Allen W. (2008). Kant. Tradução de Delamar José Volpato Dutra. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in Griot: Revista de Filosofia maintain the copyright and grant the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing sharing and adaptation, even for commercial purposes, with due recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Read more...
