The normativity of the republican theory of justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v16i2.775

Keywords:

Republicanism; Normativity; Justice; Philip Pettit.

Abstract

The normative basis of the republican conception of justice is freedom as non-domination. This concept of political freedom comprises social relations in equality of power. Non-domination represents the social condition of not being submissive to the capacity of arbitrary interference of others. Republican freedom presupposes the development of human capabilities in their fullness. The potential for human capacity development must be protected by the legal structure of the State. The State has the function of equating the differences of individuals' assets and resources with their institutional structure. It acts to offer the necessary conditions, rights and basic liberties, to individuals in their social and political life. The Republican perspective of Philip Pettit leads to the normative deduction of republican liberty and to demonstrating that the theory of justice has to presuppose the resources necessary for the development of human life in its condition of equality and freedom. The democratic structuring of society presupposes the establishment of social relations that are characterized by the social status of non-domination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alberto Paulo Neto, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR)/ Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo – Brasil, professor da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Paraná – Brasil. Realiza estágio de pós-doutorado na Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Brasil.

References

CÍCERO, Marco Tulio. Opere politiche e filosofiche di M. Tullio Ciceroni (Volume primo Lo Stato, Le leggi, I doveri). Torino: Unione Tipografico - Editrice Torinese, 1974.

CÍCERO, Marco Tulio. Da República. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1985 (Coleção Os Pensadores).

CÍCERO, Marco Tulio. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

COHEN, Joshua. Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For. Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 12, n. 2, 2004, p. 190–213.

DIGESER, Elizabeth Depalma. Citizenship and the Roman Res publica: Cicero and a Christian Corollary. In: WEINSTOCK, Daniel; NADEAU, Christian (Eds.). Republicanism: History, Theory and Practice. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2004, p. 5-19.

FOX, Matthew. Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford: OUP, 2007.

HAYWARD, Clarissa Rile. What Can Political Freedom Mean in a Multicultural Democracy? On Deliberation, Difference and Democratic Government. Political Theory, v. 39, n. 4, 2011, p. 468–97.

HOLTON, James E. Marco Tulio Cicerón. In: STRAUSS, Leo; CROPSEY, Joseph (Comp.) Historia de la filosofia politica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1993, p. 158-176.

HONOHAN, Iseult. Civic Republicanism. London/New York: Routledge, 2002.

KANT, Immanuel. Sobre a expressão corrente: isso pode ser correcto na teoria, mas nada vale na prática (1793). In: A paz perpétua e outros opúsculos. Tradução de Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1988, p. 57-102.

LOVETT, Frank. Freedom, justice, and legitimacy in Pettit’s On the People’s Terms. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29th – September 1st, 2013. Disponível em: < https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2300125>.

MARTÍ, José Luis; PETTIT, Philip. A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.

MARTÍ, José Luis; SELME, Hugo, Three Comments on Philip Pettit’s On the People’s Terms. Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), v. 5, n. 2, 2015, p. 25-42.

MORFORD, Mark. The roman philosophers: From the time of Cato the Censor to the death of Marcus Aurelius. London/New York: Routledge, 2002.

NUSSBAUM, Martha. Frontiers of Justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2006.

PAULO NETO, Alberto. Entre o consenso e a contestação no Estado democrático de direito: Uma interlocução entre a Teoria democrática de J. Habermas e P. Pettit. 2015. 198f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Filosofia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.

PAULO NETO, Alberto. A análise de Jürgen Habermas sobre a tensão entre direitos humanos e soberania popular na teoria do direito de Immanuel Kant. 2009. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

PETTIT, Philip. Just freedom: A moral compass for a complex world. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.

PETTIT, Philip. On the people’s terms: a republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

PETTIT, Philip. The Domination Complaint. Nomos, n. 46, 2005, p. 87–117.

PETTIT, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

PETTIT, Philip. Consequencialism. In: SINGER, Peter (Ed.). A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991, p. 231-238.

SEN, Amartya. A ideia de Justiça. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.

STROH, Wilfried. Cicero: Redner, Staatsmann, Philosoph. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2008.

Published

2017-12-18

How to Cite

NETO, Alberto Paulo. The normativity of the republican theory of justice. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 115–131, 2017. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v16i2.775. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/775. Acesso em: 16 may. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles