The compartmentalization of life into social roles: a study based on Alasdair Macintyre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v24i3.4913Keywords:
Fragmentation; Social roles; Moral responsibility; Emotivism; Alasdair MacIntyre.Abstract
This study investigates the fragmentation of the self into social roles and its implications for moral responsibility, based on the philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre. The analysis focuses on contemporary culture characterized by emotivism, which hinders the recognition of a universal human good and the development of moral agency. MacIntyre criticizes the liberal individualism of modernity, suggesting that the compartmentalization of social roles results in moral disorder, preventing the formation of a unified self. He argues that by acting according to the specific norms of each social role, individuals disregard a greater good, exemplified by the lack of integrity and constancy, virtues essential for possessing other virtues. The research highlights the importance of environments that allow for critical reflection and the development of moral agency. In the absence of such environments, a moral agent may fail to recognize and transcend existing standards, leading to shared moral responsibility within the sociocultural structure. MacIntyre proposes that moral agents should be responsible not only for their social roles but also as rational individuals, promoting intersubjective dialogue and the pursuit of a greater good for human life.
Downloads
References
BARBALET, Jack. Social role. In: TURNER, Bryan S. The Cambridge dictionary of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2006.
CLAYTON, Ted. Political philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre. In: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: <https://iep.utm.edu/p-macint/> Acesso em: 17 out. 2022.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. After virtue: a study in moral theory. 3 ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 2007.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Ethics and politics: selected essays, volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2006a.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Justiça de quem? Qual racionalidade? São Paulo: Loyola, 1991.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. Plain persons and moral philosophy. In: KNIGHT, Kevin (ed.). The MacIntyre reader. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 1998, p. 136-152.
MACINTYRE, Alasdair. The tasks of philosophy: selected essays, volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2006b.
MARSHALL, Gordon. A dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University, 2003.
MCGINN, Colin. Wittgenstein on meaning: an interpretation and evaluation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
MEAD, George Herbert. Mind, self, and society: the definitive edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
NOWAK, Witold M. Wholeness well lost: the problem of compartmentalization in Macintyrean critique of modernity. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia, n. 2, p.26-44, 2007.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. A Sindérese e a consciência. Questões disputadas sobre a verdade. Questões 16 e 17. Campinas: Ecclesiae, 2015.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma teológica. V. 2. 2 ed. São Paulo: Loyola, 2005.
TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma teológica. V. 4. 2 ed. São Paulo: Loyola, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leandro Bertoncello
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Griot: Revista de Filosofia maintain the copyright and grant the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing sharing and adaptation, even for commercial purposes, with due recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Read more...