Evans on Scheingedanke

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v19i2.1141

Keywords:

Philosophy of language;Ttheories of reference; Singular thoughts; Evans; Frege; Epistemology.

Abstract

Gareth Evans has proposed, in The Varieties of Reference, a theory of singular propositions which embody both Frege’s speculations about sense (Sinn) and Russell’s propositional object-dependence structure. For this purpose, he maintained that propositions containing empty singular terms, i.e., whose putatively denoted objects are non-existent, do not express any thoughts of this type. In this situation, someone who utters a sentence that contains an empty singular term can only express an apparent thought (Scheingedanke). Evans’ interpretation of Frege was criticized in works of philosophers such as Bell (1990), Geirsson (2002) and Sainsbury (2002). In this article, I aim to continue this debate and review the objections against Evan’s argument regarding the concept of Scheingedanke. I maintain that, though the work of these critics is based on a careful reading of Frege, it is not enough to dismiss Evan’s thesis. Instead, I claim that his theory would be better appreciated in an epistemic, not purely exegetical, sphere. This appears to me to be closer to the author’s intended approach regarding the theory of singular thoughts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Renato Salatiel, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP), São Paulo – SP, Brasil. Professor da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória – ES, Brasil.

References

BACK, Kent. Thought and reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

BELL, David. How Russellian was Frege? Mind, v. 99, n. 394, p. 267-277, Apr. 1990

DUMMETT, Michael. Frege’s distinction between sense and reference. In: Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.

EVANS, Gareth. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

EVANS, Gareth. Understanding demonstratives. In: EVANS, Gareth. Collected papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

FREGE, Gottlob. Posthumous Writings. HERMES, Hans; KAMBARTEL, Friedrich; KAULBACH, Friedrich (eds.). Trans.: Peter Long; Roger White. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979. [Citado como PW.]

FREGE, Gottlob. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. GABRIEL, Gottfried et al (eds.). Trans.: Hans Kaal. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980. [Citado como PMC.]

FREGE, Gottlob. O pensamento. Uma investigação lógica. In: Investigações lógicas. ALCOFORADO, Paulo (Org., trad. e notas). Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2002, p. 11-39.

FREGE, Gottlob. Sobre o sentido e a referência. In: FREGE, Gottlob. Lógica e Filosofia da Linguagem. Seleção, introdução, tradução e notas: Paulo Alcoforado. 2. ed. amp. e rev. São Paulo: Unesp, 2009a. p. 129-158.

FREGE, Gottlob. Dezessete sentenças básicas da lógica. In: FREGE, Gottlob. Lógica e Filosofia da Linguagem. Seleção, introdução, tradução e notas: Paulo Alcoforado. 2. ed. amp. e rev. São Paulo: Unesp, 2009b. p. 207-209.

FREGE, Gottlob. Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Derived using concept-script. Vols. I & II. Transl. and ed. Philip A. Ebert; Marcus Roosberg; Crispin Wright. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2016.

GEIRSSON, Heimir. Frege and object dependent propositions. Dialectica, v. 56, n. 3, p. 299-314, 2002.

JESHION, Robin. Introduction. In: JESHION, Robin (Ed.). New essays on singular thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

KAPLAN, David. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: ALMOG, Joseph; PERRY, John and WETTSTEIN, Howard (eds.). Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 481–564.

KRIPKE, Saul. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.

McDOWELL, John. [1984] De re senses. In: McDOWELL, John. Meaning, knowledge, and reality. Cambridge, Mass.; London, England. Harvard University Press, 1998. p. 214-227.

McDOWELL, John. Evans’s Frege. In: McDOWELL, John. The engaged intellect: philosophical essays. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press, 2009. p. 163-185.

PERRY, John. The problem of essential indexical: and other essays. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. [1917]. Conhecimento por familiaridade e conhecimento por descrição. In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. Misticismo e lógica; e outros ensaios. Tradução de Alberto Oliva e Luiz Alberto Cerqueira. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1977. p. 215-236.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. Da denotação. [1905]. In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. Lógica e conhecimento: ensaios escolhidos. Col. Os Pensadores. 3. ed. Tradução de Pablo Rubén Mariconda. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1989a.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. [1918]. A Filosofia do atomismo lógico. In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. Lógica e conhecimento: ensaios escolhidos. Col. Os Pensadores. 3. ed. Tradução de Pablo Rubén Mariconda. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1989b.

SAINSBURY, R. M. Departing from Frege: essays in the philosophy of language. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.

SCHIFFER, Stephen. The basis of reference. Erkenntnis, v. 13, n. 1, p. 171-206, 1978.

SEARLE, John. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

STRAWSON, Peter Frederick. Individuals: an essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Routledge, 1990.

Published

2019-06-13

How to Cite

SALATIEL, José Renato. Evans on Scheingedanke. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 71–86, 2019. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v19i2.1141. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/1141. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles