The relationship between political philosophy and democracy at Michael Walzer’s work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.730

Keywords:

Political philosophy; Democracy; Michael Walzer

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the relationship between political philosophy and democracy in the Michael Walzer’s work, influenced by John Rawls. To do this, it will be done a brief presentation of Rawls’s views about that relationship. After, it will be shown that Walzer corroborates and expands the Rawls’s conception. Finally, it will be described the role of immanent critique that Walzer attributes to political philosophy in contemporary democracies, turning it rather policy’s guide, based on privileged contemplation of any alleged transcendent and binding order, into a committed engagement  only with the very democratic order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Corrêa de Araujo, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)

Doutor em Filosofia e professor da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Espírito Santo – Brasil.

References

BERNSTEIN, Richard J.. One Step Forward, Two Steps Backward – Richard Rorty on Liberal Democracy and Philosophy. In: Political Theory, Volume 15, No. 4, November 1987, p. 538-563.

DWORKIN, Ronald. To Each His Own. In: The New York Review of Books, Volume 30, Number 6, April 1983.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Consciência moral e agir comunicativo. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003.

KYMLICKA, Will. Filosofia política contemporânea: uma introdução. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.

MOUFFE, Chantal. Democracia, cidadania e a questão do pluralismo. In: Política & Sociedade, Nº 3, outubro de 2003, p. 11-26.

RAWLS, John. Justiça como equidade: uma concepção política, não metafísica. In: Lua Nova, nº 25, 1992, p. 25-59.

RAWLS, John. O Liberalismo político. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas. In: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 92, No. 3 (March, 1995), p. 132-180.

RORTY, Richard. Democracia e Filosofia. In: Revista Redescrições, Ano 4, Número 3, 2013.

RORTY, Richard. How Relevant is Philosophy to Politics?. Richard Rorty born digital files, 1988-2003. UCIspace @ the Libraries.

SANDEL, Michael J. . O liberalismo e os limites da justiça. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2005.

VATTIMO, Gianni. VATTIMO, Gianni. (Org.) El pensamento débil. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1988.

WALZER, Michael. Achieving Global and Local Justice. In: Dissent, Volume 58, Number 3, Summer 2011, p. 42-48.

WALZER, Michael. Esferas da justiça: uma defesa do pluralismo e da igualdade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

WALZER, Michael. Interview with Michael Walzer. In: Thinking politically: essays in political theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

WALZER, Michael. Política e paixão: rumo a um liberalismo mais igualitário. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

WALZER, Michael. Philosophy and Democracy. In: Political Theory, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Aug., 1981), pp. 379-399.

WALZER, Michael. Pluralism and Social Democracy. In: Dissent Magazine, Winter, 1998.

WALZER, Michael. The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. In: Political Theory, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Feb., 1990), pp. 6-23.

WALZER, Michael. “Spheres of Justice”: An Exchange. Michael Walzer, reply by Ronald Dworkin. In: The New York Review of Books, Volume 30, Number 12, July 21, 1983.

WILLIAMS, Jeffrey J. . Criticism and Connection: An Interview with Michael Walzer. In: Symploke, Vol. 20, Nos. 1-2 (2012), p. 371-390.

Published

2016-12-18

How to Cite

ARAUJO, Ricardo Corrêa de. The relationship between political philosophy and democracy at Michael Walzer’s work. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 1–16, 2016. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.730. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/730. Acesso em: 4 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles