Troubles with class nominalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.679

Keywords:

Class Nominalism; Natural Classes; Lewis

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the Class Nominalism as a solution to the problem of universals. At first, I attempt a clarification of the problem of universals. Secondly, I provide the definition of Class Nominalism. Later, I discuss the theses of Lewis and Quinton and I analyze how they try to get rid of some classic critiques. I argue that they are not successful and, therefore, their theory has serious problems. Finally, I discuss two critical topics to Class Nominalism: the problem of relations and the problem of ontological economy. I think the class nominalism does not provide an adequate analysis of relations. Finally, I argue that this theory is not economic (from an ontological point of view). There are realistic and nominalists theories more economical than Class Nominalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valdetonio Pereira de Alencar, Universidade Federal do Cariri (UFCA)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro – Brasil. Professor da Universidade Federal do Cariri (UFCA), Ceará – Brasil.

References

ABELARDO, Pedro. From the “glosses on Porphyry” in his logica ‘ingredientbus’. In: SPADE, P. V. (ed.). Five Texts on the mediaeval problem of universals: Porphyry, Booethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham. Introdução, tradução e notas: Paul Vincent Spade. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.

ARMSTRONG, David Malet. A theory of universals: volume I: nominalism and realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

ARMSTRONG, David Malet. Universals: an opinionated introduction. San Francisco: Westview Press, 1989.

BENACERRAF, Paul. What numbers could not be. In: BENACERRAF, P. e PUTNAM, H. Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

ENDERTON, Herbert. Elements of set theory. San Diego: Academic Press, 1977.

GOODMAN, Nelson e QUINE, Willard Von Orman. Steps toward a constructive nominalism. The Journal of Symbolic Logic. V. 12, No 4, pp. 105-122, dez. 1947.

HAACK, R. J. Natural and arbitrary classes. Australian Journal of Philosophy. Volume 47, No 3, pp. 307-321, 1969.

LEWIS, David. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

LEWIS, David. Nominalistic set theory. Nous. Volume 4, No 3, pp. 225-240, set. 1970

LEWIS, David. New work for a theory of universals (1983). In: KIM, J. e SOSA, E. (Ed.). Metaphysics: an anthology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. p. 209-232.

LOUX, Michael. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction. 3. ed. New York: Routledge, 2006.

O’LEARY-HAWTHORNE, John e COVER, Jan. A world of universals. Philosophical Studies, Volume 91, pp. 205–219, 1998.

OLIVER, Alex. Classes and Goodman's nominalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 93, pp. 179-191, 1993.

QUINTON, Anthony. Properties and classes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Volume 58, pp. 33-58, 1957.

QUINTON, Anthony. The nature of things. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973

RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA, Gonzalo. Resemblance nominalism: a solution to the problem of universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

SHOTTENKIRK, Dena. Nominalism and its aftermath: the philosophy of Nelson Goodman. New York: springer, 2009.

WOLTERSTORFF, Nicholas. On universals: an essay in ontology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Published

2016-06-18

How to Cite

ALENCAR, Valdetonio Pereira de. Troubles with class nominalism. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 373–390, 2016. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.679. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/679. Acesso em: 4 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles