From leiden an unbestimmtheit to “erfolg an bestimmtheit”: a possible way to normative reconstruction by honneth?

Abstract

Honneth proposes in his book Leiden an Unbestimmtheit revitalized the Hegel’s Philosophy of law in sense of the idea of universal Freie Wille determines the overall sphere of law which entails thinking about the self-determination of the individual and their own intersubjective conditions of argument self-fulfillment. In this sense, the basic idea is the concept of Freedom. If Honneth hits in diagnosing propose a critical Lecture of the Hegelian philosophy of law based on ethics and not only morality I don’t think do satisfactorily with regard to thinking about institutions. That's because the intersubjective conditions of self-realization of the subject shall be interpreted according Honneth for a theory of justice that takes seriously the mediating institutions and other social forms. Why don’t think of institutions as institutions of social pathologies resolving mediators.  My critical rests on that Honneth wish a "reconstruction" normative necessarily thinking about institutions and normative mediation as a pressuposition based on a social ontology argument, but Honneth not even want nor pledged in now exposed text. In this article, I propose to explicit this deficit about Leiden an Unbestimmtheit for thus proposing Erfolg an Bestimmtheit, what constitutes a task as Social Philosophy, the social-ontological assumption emerges as a normative space.