Relations and parallels between Rousseau and radical ecology contemporary

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v8i2.559

Keywords:

Deep Ecology; Environmental Ethics; Rousseau; Self-love; Ecocentrism.

Abstract

It was found that, although several publications the thought of Rousseau in the contemporary debate the environmental philosophy, take part in of their thinking is still depressed. Then related to some underlying concepts of ecology with the contemporary radical philosophy of Rousseau. It was found that both go ahead to a radical critique of anthropocentrism, proposing as an alternative, one ecocentrism. Focused on the concept of "intrinsic value" of nature and its ethical significance of the relationship between humans and the environment. For Rousseau that relationship is developed through a deep analysis of the passions, love of self (amour de soi) and self-love (amour propre). It was found that both the radical ecology as Rousseau did not believes in the possibility of a return to the state of nature, but it is possible to recover the happy experience of connection with all life, that the state gave to men. Recovery can only occur in another record amid civilization and technology. Showed the importance of the tactics Rousseau this issue by proposing the expansion of self-love to a whole dimension, thus recovering the possibility of a happy and significant life (good life). However, much like Rousseau supporters of radical ecology considers the difficulties in performing both experiences the totality of life and ethics in the relationship between humankind and nature, given the conditions of modernity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eduardo Cardoso Braga, Centro Universitário Senac (SENAC/SP)

Mestre em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo – Brasil, Doutor em Comunicação e Semiótica pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-SP), São Paulo – Brasil. Professor do Centro Universitário Senac-SP.

References

BRONNER, Stephen. Ideas in Action: Political Tradition in the Twentieth Century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 1999.

CALLICOT, J. Baird. In Defense of the Land Ethic. Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany: New York Press, 1989.

COOPER, Laurence. Rousseau, Nature, & the Problem of the Good Life. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.

COOPER, Laurence. “Between Eros and Will to Power: Rousseau and ‘the Desire to Extend our Being,’”. In: American Political Science Review 98(2004), pp. 105–120.

DRENGSON, A. & INOUE, Y. (ed.). The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1995.

EASTERBROOK, Gregg. The Progress Paradox. New York: Random House, 2003.

ESTERMANN, J. & PEÑA, A. Filosofia andina. Iquique-Chile: ECTA-IQUIQUE, 1997.

JONAS, Hans. The Phenomenon of life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. New York : Harper and Row, 1966.

JONAS, Hans. El Principio de Responsabilidad: Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona : Herder, 1995.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Introdução à metafísica. Tradução: Emmanuel Carneiro leão. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Tempo Brasileiro (Ed. Universidade de Brasília), 1978.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Ser e Tempo, vol. I e II. Petrópolis: Vozes, 4ª edição, 1993.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. “Construir, habitar, pensar”. In: HEIDEGGER, M. Ensaios e conferências. (trad. Emamanuel C. Leão) Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. “A questão da técnica” (Die Frage nach der Technik). In: Cadernos de Tradução, no. 2, Tradução de Marco Aurélio Werle. São Paulo: Departamento de Filosofia da USP, 1997.

LANE, Joseph H. & CLARK, Rebecca R. “The Solitary Walker in the Polical World: The Paradoxes of Rousseau and Deep Ecology”. In: Political Theory, Volume 34, Number 1, February, pp. 62-94, 2006.

LEOPOLD, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

MASTERS, R. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.

MELZER, Arthur. The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

MOORE, G. E. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2008.

MURPHY, Andrew R. "Environmentalism, Antimodernism, and the Recurrent Rhetoric of Decline." In: Environmental Ethics 25.1; pp. 79-98, 2003.

NAESS, Arne. “The Shallow and the Deep, Long Range Ecology Movement: A Summary”. In: Inquiry 16, pp. 95-100, 1973.

NAESS, Arne. Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. Australia: Murdoch University, 1986.

NAESS, Arne. “A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement”. In: Environmental Ethics, Vo1.6, No.4, 1984.

NAESS, Arne & SESSIONS, George. “The Basic Principles of Deep Ecology,” In: Earth First! 4, June 20, 1984.

NAESS, Arne & ROTHENBERG, D. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

NORTON, Bryan G. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

OELSCHLAEGER, Max. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.

PASSMORE, John. Man’s Responsability for Nature. Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. London: Duckworth, 1974.

PLATTNER, Marc. Rousseau’s State of Nature: An Interpretation of the Discourse on Inequality. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1979.

REGAN, Tom. All That Dwell Therein: Essays on Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press,1982.

ROLSTON III, Holmes. Environmental Ethics. Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.

ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Oeuvres complètes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, avec des notes historiques..., Les Confessions. Discours. Politique. Tome I, Paris: Chez Alexandre Houssiaux, Libraire, 1852.

ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Oeuvres complètes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, avec des notes historiques..., La Nouvelle Héloïse. Emile. Lettre à M. de Beaumont. Tome II, Paris: Chez Alexandre Houssiaux, Libraire, 1852.

ROUSSEAU, J.-J. Os devaneios do caminhante solitário. Organização e tradução de Fúlvia Maria Luíza Moretto. Brasília: Ed. da UnB, 1995.

SARTRE, Jean-Paul. O Ser e O Nada. Tradução e notas de Paulo Perdigão. Petrópolis, 2001.

SCOTT, John T. “The Theodicy of the Second Discourse: The ‘Pure State of Nature’ and Rousseau’s Political Thought”. In: American Political Science Review, pp. 696–711, 1992.

SESSIONS, George & DEVALL, William. Deep Ecology, Living as if Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City: Gibbs M. Smith, Inc., 1985.

SINGER, Peter. Animal Liberation. A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: New York Review-Random Press, 1975.

SNYDER, Gary. The Practice of the Wild. San Fransisco: North Point Press, 1990.

SOUZA, Maria das Graças de. “Ocasião propícia, ocasião nefasta: tempo, história e ação política em Rousseau”. In: Trans/Form/Ação, São Paulo, 29(2): 249-256, 2006.

STONE, Christopher. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos: Kaufman, 1972.

TAYLOR, Paul W. “Are humans superior to animals and plants?” In: Environmental Ethics. University of North Texas, Summer v. 6, n. 2, 1984.

TAYLOR, Paul W. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Studies in Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986.

THOREAU, Henry David. A desobediência civil. Tradução: Sérgio Karam. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1997.

WORSTER, Donald. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Published

2013-12-15

How to Cite

BRAGA, Eduardo Cardoso. Relations and parallels between Rousseau and radical ecology contemporary. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 201–225, 2013. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v8i2.559. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/559. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles