What is ‘Metametaphysics’? An analysis of Meinong’s, Carnap’s and Quine’s Methodologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v21i2.2336

Keywords:

Metametaphysics; Methodology of Metaphysics; Meinong, Carnap, Quine.

Abstract

 Metametaphysics is the study regarding the foundations and the methodology of Metaphysics. We’ll analyze in this paper three methodologies that established the origins of Metametaphysics in the Analytic Tradition: that of Alexius Meinong, Rudolf Carnap and Willard van Orman Quine. According to Meinong, there is a distinction between ‘to exist’ and ‘there is’ and, in order to preserve the intuition that every intentional act is directed towards an object, there are things that do not exist. According to Carnap, the questions in Metaphysics can be easily answered by empirical or inferential means once we adopt a linguistic framework and answer these questions internally to this framework. Quine argued that to take an entity as existing is to take it as the value of a bound variable. Metametaphysics is relevant because it disambiguates our vocabulary and makes the philosophers avoid verbal disputes. Our objective in this paper was not to show our preferences to one of these methodologies but to provide a starting point for those who are not familiar with these matters — just so other researchers may engage with the issues that belong to Metametaphysics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Italo Lins Lemos, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis – SC, Brasil. Professor Temporário do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM), Maringá – PR, Brasil.

Cristian Kraemer, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Estudante de Filosofia na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis – SC, Brasil.

References

BAKER, Lynne Rudder. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

BERTO, Francesco & PLEBANI, Matteo. Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2015.

BERTO, Francesco. Modal Meinongianism and Fiction: the Best of Three Worlds. In. Philosophy Studies, v. 152, pp. 313-334, 2011.

CARNAP, Rudolf. Empirismo, Semântica e Ontologia. São Paulo: Abril Cultural (Coleção Os Pensadores), 1980.

CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

CHALMERS, David. Ontological Anti-Realism. In. CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

CRANE, Tim. The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

DORR, Cian. What we Disagree about when we Disagree about Ontology. In. KALDERON, Mark Eli (ed.). Fictionalist Approaches to Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

EKLUND, Matti. Metaontology. In. Nous, v. 47, n. 2, pp. 229-249, 2013.

EKLUND, Matti. Carnap’s Metaontology. In. Nous, v. 47, n. 2, pp. 229-249, 2011.

EKLUND, Matti. Carnap and Ontological Pluralism. In. CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

EKLUND, Matti. Metaontology. In. Philosophy Compass, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 317-334, 2006.

FIELD, Hartry. Science without Numbers: a Defense of Nominalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

GALOIS, Andre. Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake? In. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 72, pp. 263-283, 1998.

HIRSCH, Eli. Quantifier Variance and Realism. In. SOSA, Ernest & VILLANUEVA, Enrique. Philosophical Issues 12: Realism and Relativism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002

HUME, David. Investigações sobre o entendimento humano e sobre os princípios da moral. Tradução de José Oscar de Almeida Marques. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2003.

INWAGEN, Peter Van. Meta-ontology. Erkenntnis, v. 48, pp. 233-250, 1998.

INWAGEN, Peter van. Fiction and Metaphysics. In. Philosophy and Literature, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 67-77, 1983.

INWAGEN, Peter van. Creatures of Fiction. In. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 299-308, 1977.

LEMOS, Italo Lins. A Metafísica e a Semântica da Ficção: Uma Abordagem Artefactual. Tese (Doutorado) — Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia, Florianópolis, 2020.

MANLEY, David. Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics. In. CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

MEINONG, Alexius. Sobre a Teoria dos Objetos. In. BRAIDA, Celso (Org.). Três Aberturas em Ontologia: Frege, Twardowski e Meinong. Florianópolis: Rocca Brayde, 2005.

PARSONS, Terence. Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.

PRIEST, Graham. Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.

PUTNAM, Hilary. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.

QUINE, Willard von Orman. Sobre o que Há. In. De um Ponto de Vista Lógico. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2011a.

QUINE, Willard von Orman. Dois Dogmas do Empirismo. In. De um Ponto de Vista Lógico. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2011b.

QUINE, Willard von Orman. On the Individuation of Attributes. In. ANDERSON et al. (eds.). The Logical Enterprise. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.

QUINE, Willard von Orman. On Carnap’s Views of Ontology. In. Journal of Philosophy, v. 53, n. 5, pp. 177-187, 1956.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. On Denoting. In. Mind, v. 14, n. 56, pp. 479-493, 1905.

SAINSBURY, Mark. Reference without Referents. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.

SCHAFFER, Jonathan. On What Grounds What. In. CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundation of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

SCHLICK, Moritz. Positivism and Realism. In. AYER, Alfred Jules. Logical Positivism. Londres: Macmillan Publishing, 1959.

SIDER, Ted. Four-Dimentionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

SOAMES, Scott. Ontology, Analyticity, and Meaning: the Quine-Carnap Dispute. In. CHALMERS, David; MANLEY, David; WASSERMAN, Ryan (eds.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

TAHKO, Tuomas. An Introduction to Metametaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

THOMASSON, Amie. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

THOMASSON, Amie. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

YABLO, Stephen. “Non-Catastrophic Presupposition Failure.” In Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker, eds. Judith Thomson and Alex Byrne, 164-190. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006

ZALTA, Edward. The Theory of Abstract Objects, 2004. Disponível em: <https://mally.stanford.edu/theory.html#dis>. Acesso em: 4 de agosto de 2020.

ZALTA, Edward. Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1983.

ZALTA, Edward & McMICHAEL, Alan. An Alternative Theory of Nonexistent Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic, v. 9, pp. 297-313, 1980.

Published

2021-06-02

How to Cite

LINS LEMOS, Italo; KRAEMER, Cristian. What is ‘Metametaphysics’? An analysis of Meinong’s, Carnap’s and Quine’s Methodologies. Griot : Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 237–255, 2021. DOI: 10.31977/grirfi.v21i2.2336. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrb.edu.br/index.php/griot/article/view/2336. Acesso em: 4 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles